We haven’t set a number. We have set the shape.
Nexorah has run in no schemes yet, so there is no fair per-scheme figure to publish — anything written here would be a guess dressed up as a fact. What is already decided is the shape any price will take, and a trustee who has to justify the spend to the other owners, under personal liability for the decision, deserves that much before there is a figure at all.
Four commitments that don’t move, whatever the figure turns out to be.
These aren’t promotional lines. They’re constraints the product is designed around, and they hold regardless of what a scheme ends up paying.
- 01
Owners and renters pay nothing. Ever.
The body corporate is the customer — the people who live in the building are never billed for the software that runs it. A levy statement you have to pay to read isn’t a service; it’s a toll.
- 02
The scheme can export its whole record, any day.
Minutes, ledgers, the arrears book, every document, every audit line — in full, whenever a trustee asks. Price was never meant to be the reason a scheme stays; the export is what makes leaving possible, so staying has to be earned every month instead.
- 03
No per-seat charge.
A body corporate is never asked to pay more for including more of its owners. Adding a tenant, a new trustee, or the rest of the unit register costs the scheme nothing extra — charging for participation would work against the point of the product.
- 04
The Finance Analyser is priced apart.
Standardising a set of annual financial statements is different work from running a scheme month to month. It’s a plugin — priced on its own, only for schemes that want it, never folded into what every scheme pays whether it uses it or not.
More on what the Finance Analyser does on its own page. It reads a scheme’s annual financial statements — any layout, any preparer — and returns them as one comparable record. Nothing above changes for schemes that never touch it.
The figure isn’t set. Here’s how it will be shaped.
A body corporate is run by volunteers spending other owners’ money, so a shrug isn’t a good enough answer — this is the closest honest one available before the number exists.
- It will scale with units, not with drama
- A twelve-unit block and a two-hundred-unit block are not the same amount of work — different volumes of levies, arrears, meetings, maintenance jobs and votes moving through the system every month. The per-scheme charge will follow that, rather than a flat fee that overcharges the small schemes and undercharges the large ones.
- It will not scale with people
- Units, not owners or tenants — see 03 on the left. A 40-unit scheme is priced as a 40-unit scheme, whether it has forty separate owners or three owners who each hold a block of doors.
- It isn’t set yet
- We’re not publishing a starting-from figure or a placeholder table to have something to put in this box. When it’s set, it will be published here in full, with the reasoning attached — the same way every other figure on this site shows its working.
No price on it yet. See the shape it will follow.
The simulator doesn’t carry a price tag either — what it shows is the same thing a price will be based on. Describe a scheme by its units, its levy and its arrears, and watch the operational load scale: the debtors book, the meetings, the jobs, the votes. That’s the shape a figure will follow too.